$3m in Super? Here's your nudge on Division 296

A new tax on high super balances passed the Senate and starts 1 July 2026. While there are decisions to make, there's no need to rush or panic. Here's what matters, and what to do about it.


THE BASICS 

SUPER EARNINGS ABOVE $3M WILL BE TAXED MORE. HERE’S BY HOW MUCH.

Division 296 adds a layer of tax on top of what your fund already pays. It applies only to the slice of your earnings above each threshold - not your whole balance. 

 

Up to $3M

15%

No change

$3M – $10M

30%

+15% Div 296

Above $10M

40%

+25% Div 296

 

The thresholds rise with CPI over time ($150,000 and $500,000 increments respectively). And importantly - this tax is assessed on you personally, not your fund. You choose whether to pay it yourself or pull money from super to cover it. 

One thing the legislation got right: unrealised gains on assets inside your fund are not taxed. The tax is based on taxable income concepts - paper gains don’t count until they’re realised.

HOW THE TAX WORKS 

IT’S NOT JUST A FLAT RATE ON EVERYTHING ABOVE $3M. THE MATHS MATTERS.

Two things determine your bill each year: your “earnings” for Div 296 purposes, and what proportion of your balance sits above the threshold. 

Earnings aren’t the same as your fund’s investment return - for SMSF members, they’re broadly the fund’s taxable income, adjusted for contributions and pensions. A special actuarial certificate will be needed each year to allocate earnings to each member. For members of large APRA regulated funds, an earnings figure will be attributed to each member on a “fair and reasonable basis” (guidance of which is currently in draft form). 

 
Nudge on the proportion rule: the calculation uses the higher of your opening and closing balance for the year. Dropping your balance just before 30 June won't save you. Plan earlier. (Note: in FY2027 only, just the closing balance at 30 June 2027 is used — the higher-of rule kicks in from FY2028.)
 
 

WHAT DOES THIS ACTUALLY COST

Here’s a brief example of the potential impact of Div296 Tax.

Before Div 296 Sarah has $5M in super. Her fund earns $200,000. Tax paid by the fund: $30,000 (15%). Sarah pays nothing extra.

After Div 296 Sarah still has $5M in super. Her fund earns $200,000. Fund pays $30,000 (15%) as usual. Sarah now also receives a personal Div 296 assessment of $12,000. Total tax on those earnings: $42,000.

 
Before
Super balance$5M
Fund earnings$200,000
Tax paid by fund (15%)$30,000
Personal Div 296 bill
Total tax on earnings$30,000
After
Super balance$5M
Fund earnings$200,000
Tax paid by fund (15%)$30,000
Personal Div 296 bill$12,000
Total tax on earnings$42,000

* Earnings figures are illustrative only — actual Div 296 earnings are determined by the Tax Office based on your fund's taxable income.

 

In the After example, as 40% of Sarah's balance sits above $3M — 40% of her earnings ($80,000) are subject to the additional 15% tax → additional $12,000 Div296 bill to her personally.

THE CGT RESET - THIS ONE’S FOR EVERYONE

NOT OVER $3M YET? THIS STILL MATTERS TO YOU

The legislation allows SMSFs to reset the cost base of assets held at 30 June 2026 to market value. That means future Div 296 tax won’t apply to gains that built up before the new rules started. 

Every SMSF can elect in - not just those already over $3M. If growth is going to take you there, locking in this adjustment now could save real money later.  

The catch: it applies to all CGT assets in the fund. You can’t cherry-pick. 

 
The election deadline is the due date of your 2027 SMSF annual return - generally 15 May 2028. Late lodgement of your 2026 return brings that deadline forward. Don’t let an admin slip cost you this option.
 
 
IS SUPER STILL WORTH IT? 

FOR MOST PEOPLE BETWEEN $3M AND $10M - YES, STILL.

Super at 30% is still more tax-effective than most alternatives. The tax only bites the earnings above the threshold, not everything inside. For most people in this range, and particularly if you’re in a wealth accumulation phase, staying put and letting the structure do its job remains the right call. That said, "do nothing" is still a decision but the right answer depends on your situation. 

Withdrawing below $3M might make sense for some. But it has its own tax and estate planning consequences. Don’t move money without advice.

 
IF YOU HOLD UNLISTED OR SPECULATIVE ASSETS 

SOME ASSETS NEED A CLOSER LOOK

If you hold unlisted or speculative investments inside super and their value swings significantly, you may find yourself in pulled into Div 296 territory because the valuation uplift tips your total super balance above $3M. Once you're in the regime, you pay additional tax on your earnings for that year.

The sting comes if that valuation subsequently reverses and drops you back below $3M. The value that pushed you over the threshold disappears — but the extra tax you paid doesn't come back. What’s even worse, if it swings back up again you’ll be back in the Div296 regime.

 
The nudge: if you hold unlisted, illiquid, or highly speculative assets inside super, now is the time to think carefully about whether that's still the right structure for them.
 
 
IF YOU WANT TO PROTEST 

EXITING IS AN OPTION. JUST DO IT PROPERLY. 

If you'd rather not deal with Div 296 at all, reducing your super balance below $3M is a legitimate strategy. But it needs to be done carefully - a rushed exit can cost more than the tax itself. And it's not a one-off: you'll need to stay below $3M at every 30 June, not just get there once. 

 
Watch your assets carefully. Make sure you are well below $3M - if you realise gains to withdraw funds but don’t quite make it below $3M you may have signed yourself up for a bigger Div296 bill than you otherwise would have had as capital gains are ‘earnings’.

The deadline is 30 June 2027 - but that doesn’t mean wait until June 2027. Good planning takes time. Come and talk to us now.
 
THE BIGGER PICTURE 

SUPER WAS BUILT AS AN ACCUMULATION VEHICLE, NOT A TRANSFER VEHICLE

Super has long been one of Australia's most tax-effective ways to accumulate wealth. Division 296 is the latest - and most significant - watering down of that advantage. It won't be the last. 

The bigger picture here isn't just tax. It's generational. 

This regime sharpens the focus on something that hasn’t changed but is rarely talked about: death benefits tax. The tax on super paid to non-dependants on death hasn’t moved, and this regime makes the cost of getting your superannuation and estate planning wrong much higher.  

What is your plan for the realisation of fund assets and withdrawal of funds from the superannuation system over time? 

Where do you want your assets to end up? What does your legacy look like? These aren’t morbid questions. They’re planning ones. 

The new tax is also cause for a review of your estate planning arrangements. If a surviving spouse receives a death benefit or reversionary pension which pushes their total super balance above $3M, there will be Div296 implications for the survivor that are something to work through now – not later.    

If you’re a client of Nudge, we’ll be working through these questions with you progressively ahead of 30 June 2027 to nudge things in the right direction.  

 
WHAT TO DO AND WHEN 

TWO DATES THAT MATTER RIGHT NOW.

30 June 2027 If you want to get your balance below $3M before Div 296 applies, this is the date. Your balance here sets your first-year liability.
~15 May 2028 Deadline to elect into the CGT cost base reset for your SMSF. Miss this and you may have left money on the table.

The introduction of Division 296 is not cause for panic – but it is a good prompt to revisit your broader super strategy.

If you and your spouse are approaching a combined balance of $3M, or you’re thinking about how your super gets distributed, there are Div 296 implications for death benefits and reversionary pensions that are worth working through with us. 

 
We’re working through this with our SMSF clients ahead of 30 June 2027. If you’re over - or approaching - $3M, now’s the time to nudge things into shape.

Get in touch → hello@nudge.accountants

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

The articles, templates, and media posted on this blog do not give business, accounting, taxation or financial planning advice and should not be relied upon as such. The articles are intended to provide information in a summary form and are general in nature. Formal business, accounting, taxation or financial planning advice should be sought in particular matters. Nudge Accountants Pty Ltd accepts no liability in respect of this information and any person acting solely on the information contained within does so entirely at their own risk.

Previous
Previous

A few well-timed nudges

Next
Next

FAQ on FBT